The DPZ Team and our Professional Network
A Protean Organization
DPZ is a protean organization consisting of offices in the United States and affiliates working in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Our offices are supported by a wide range of professionals in architecture, planning, engineering, transportation, and health care. As a protean organization, teams are tailored to the needs of each individual project on a cross-professional and cross-locational basis.
What we do:
How we work:
The Charrette, DPZ Style: The term charrette has changed in its application to architecture, design and planning. We began charretting in the 1980's. When we say charrette at DPZ, we mean efficiency and value. Our preferred method of working brings stakeholders and decision makers together and gets results: multi-disciplinary teams, virtual offices and 24-hour turn-around. We put in the time up front so we don't waste time and money later.
Books & Publications
Project Categories:• Planning• Code Writing• Architectural DesignProject Map:
Telal Sumou Al Khobar, KSA
Costa Verbena Pititinga, Brazil
East End Virginia, USA
Tornagrain The Highlands, UK
Miami 21 Florida, USA
Downcity Providence Rhode Island, USA
Latest News Articles:
Tour a Pioneering Beach Town That Fosters CommunityJohn Hill, Houzz2013-10-03, Full Article
Andres Duany and Emily Talen Respond to Michael Sorkin's Review of Landscape Urbanism and its Discontents: Dissimulating the Sustainable City Emily Talen, Architectural Record 2013-08-13, Full Article
Cutting red tape; easing frustration High Point Enterprise 2013-08-12, Full Article
• News in 2013• Archives: 2010 - 2012• Archives: 2000 - 2009• Archives: 1990 - 1999• Archives: 1980 - 1989
College of Charleston, 2012
Planning Award for Public Outreach & Engagement
For East End
American Planning Association, Virginia Chapter , 2011
For Miami 21
Congress for New Urbanism and the Center for Applied Transect Studies, 2011
Recent and Past Awards:
• Recognition since 2010• Recognition: 2000 - 2009• Recognition: 1990 - 1999• Recognition: 1980 - 1989
Facebook | Twitter
(redirected from Thought.AgrarianUrbanism)
Agrarian Urbanism is a concept that involves food not as a means of making a living, but as a basis for making a life and structuring the places in which we live. The shift in focus from “agricultural urbanism” or “urban agriculture” to the more encompassing term of “agrarian” refers to the planning initiative developed and forwarded by DPZ, promoting a type of sustainable community that intensifies agricultural activity across the Transect whilst promoting the associated economic, environmental and social benefits. This initiative has direct links with each of DPZ’s other initiatives - contributing to their goals or, in the case of Sprawl Repair, being one of the possible outcomes.
Garden Cities: Theory & Practice of Agrarian Urbanism2011, The Prince's Foundation for the Built EnvironmentBy: Andres Duany and Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company
Research is ongoing to develop techniques for assimilating agriculture into an urbanism acceptable to the expectations of modern life and meeting the choice of lifestyles of Transect-based plans.
The ability to grow food has implications for communities on multiple levels: from food security and health issues, to ensuring a local economy, to the vast environmental benefits of local farming, and the social benefits of a productive activity in which all members of a community can engage.
The dominance of large lot, low-density housing has become typical in many American suburbs. While appearingly idyllic, when these spaces are not incorporated into a larger urban and regional plan, the repetition and redundancy of a single slice of the transect can be the most detrimental type of sprawl, whereas when carefully incorporated into a larger plan arranged according to the transect, can have quite a different effect.
When farmland is built upon, a basic premise in Agrarian Urbanism is that one third will be urbanized while the production of the whole will be tripled. This trade-off is achieved by intensifying the agricultural activity at every level of the transect; from window boxes, balcony
and roof gardens in the more urban Transect Zones, to the progressively larger community gardens, yard gardens, small farms, and ultimately large farms in the more suburban and rural Transect Zones.
The condition specified in Association Documents will be that every dwelling, in some measure, participates (or allocates that portion of the household budget which would normally be dedicated to maintaining ornamental landscaping) in the production of food. Larger farms may be centrally managed with connection to distribution systems. There will be a heavy equipment yard held
in common, as well as facilities for the processing and storage of high value food. This is part of the town square also has the new facilities of a local university’s agricultural department.
This is NOT urban agriculture. This is agricultural urbanism in which all aspects of the urbanism are focused on the production of food.
There is a very positive attitude towards agricultural urbanism on the part of those who are environmentally concerned, those who would enjoy the society of a shared endeavor (front gardens were introduced for the purpose of social discourse—a role not unlike that of a porch) and
for those who wish to take precautions with their health and welfare.
Urbanism must be cohesively designed. By concentrating development, land is liberated for agricultural use. Agricultural projects must be precise both in terms of the land cultivated, and in the management of it. The transect will help organize the appropriate placement of agriculture at the scale of both the master plan and the architecture of buildings.
Every dwelling along the transect will contribute in some measure to food production, either by labor or by wages. Owner’s association agreements regarding dedicating the funding which is normally allocated to landscape will be for agriculture subsidies. Producing food on-site allows:
At the edge of the Transect, the same large lot zoning, which can, in repetition, lead to the worst kind of sprawl can exist successfully in limited quantities. The critical difference shown here is proximity to urbanism which limits the repetition of a single transect zone. The location of the structures along the thoroughfare creates a sense of community and, the farther from urbanism these lots are, the more self-sufficient they are shown to become. In most circumstances, a five acre parcel is large enough to allow some animals and some crop rotation.
Incorporating the production of food sources into an urban masterplan results in built-in efficiencies, both economic and environmental. Because there is practicality towards closing
a natural cycle, many costs may be reduced or eliminated, including waste disposal, food fertilzers, and food transportation, when food is grown locally. In the project shown here, the following efficiencies were realized:
The plan for this agricultural community provides a variety of ways for different scales of agriculture to plug into the urban fabric. This maintains open views into the agrarian lands and allows an economic and social interchange between the active agriculture and the town.
Intra-Urban greens are intended to democratize agricultural opportunity. These growing spaces vary in size depending on their location and proximity to density, in accordance with the transect. They may be publicly or privately held on the ground or within buildings.
The Market Square depicted here is centrally situated between agricultural land and residential development and is anchored by a university’s Urban Agriculture studies department. It is within a ten-minute walk of all residences and will be part of a regional transportation network, connecting it to the existing town and village centers.
The main thoroughfare that passes the square is lined with ground-floor retail, live- work units and community facilities.
Value Added Agriculture refers to the processing and preservation of foodstuffs in a way that increases their market value. Bakeries and canneries are examples of two programs that buffer market and crop fluctuations, allow the use of less than perfect produce (creating value where none might otherwise exist), and make use of less skilled or part-time labor, including a part of the population that might not otherwise be employed. Therefore, including of these spaces into the program of an agricultural town is important for its economy.
This study shows the insertion of dedicated agricultural areas into various lot and building types along the Transect. It is an organizing diagram that moves from the more rural to the more urban, using the single acre as a point of reference.
In reality, a hierarchy of thoroughfares would allow several blocks to be joined depending on the location along the transect.
SouthlandsTsawwassen, B.C., Canada 538 acres, designed in 2008
HampsteadMontgomery, Alabama, USA 416 acres, designed in 2006
CloudrockMoab, Utah, USA2.050 acres, designed in 2005
Miami-Dade Agriculture & Rural Area Study Florida, USAdesigned in 1997
- Book | Garden Cities- Hampstead Institute- Sky Institute
Agrarian Urbanism Overview
More About Agrarian Urbanism
Projects & Resources