| COMMENTARY
ON THE CHARTER OF THE CNU
7. Civic buildings and public gathering places require important
sites to reinforce community identity and the culture of democracy.
They deserve distinctive form; because their role is different from
that of other buildings and places that constitute the fabric of
the city.
Vertical Infrastructure: Civic and public buildings are
considered to be vertical infrastructure. They are long-term investments,
as important to the functioning and the welfare of a community as
the horizontal infrastructure of thoroughfares and utilities.
Public and Civic: Public buildings are those which are held
in common by the entire community. They usually pertain to government,
public education, and recreation and to transportation. Civic buildings
are those administered by private organizations. These are usually
religious, cultural, educational institutions and certain sporting
venues.
Enabling the buildings: Public and civic buildings will
come into being only if provision is made for them at various times
in the urban process. It is fundamental that sites must be reserved
early in the planning and prepared for donation to suitable civic
organizations. By being grouped as infrastructure the construction
of the buildings may be funded by municipalities by the financial
residue of minimized horizontal infrastructure through compact development.
In the increasingly common private governments, the community association
should be financially structured to enable civic improvements in
addition to the usual provisions for ongoing maintenance. For developers,
such buildings may play the role of amenities, which for purposes
of marketing can substitute for an entry feature or a golf course.
Identity and Differentiation: A public or civic building,
to be an effective repository of a communitys pride and an
instrument of its identity, should be readily identifiable as special.
It is no longer possible to depend on an identity based on scale,
as public buildings today are often smaller than private ones. A
more realistic and economical strategy is to enhance the buildings
by granting them special locations. Such significant sites are generally
those which terminate the axial vista of a thoroughfare and those
which enfront or occupy an open space such as a plaza or a square.
A supplementary method is to differentiate the public buildings
b tectonic elaboration of their construction. This involves the
establishment of a dialectic between private and public architecture.
This may include the use of culturally based elements such as a
tower or a colonnade (as a yellow mansard represents fast food).
Certain configurations and are for public buildings establishing
a modern version of the duality of classical and vernacular. Sometimes
the landscape associated with the building (the entourage) can become
the significant difference.
The most likely strategy, however, assumes an architectural code
limiting the private buildings to tectonic modesty (a visual silence),
while the public buildings are allowed be remain uncoded, thus able
to be fully expressive of the aspirations of the institutions they
embody or of the aesthetic inspiration of their architects. I
Concentration and Dispersion There is no question that urbanisticaly,
if not administratively, several smaller public buildings are superior
to a single composite megastructure. By separating them, the public
building's role is easier to grasp and also more likely to decant
activity into the public open space rather than maintaining it with
an indoor circular corridor system.
There remains the open question of the public buildings' placement
within the urban structure. To group all the public buildings at
the community core does enliven the public realm at that one place
more intensely. On the other hand, the dispersal of these special
buildings more equitably leavens the community and contributes to
localized identity. Both are valid within the American urban tradition.
* There are other types of places that play a public role while
belonging neither to the civic nor the public categories. These
are the informal community gathering places between the workplace
and the residence. Typically they are diners, corner stores, cafes,
pubs, barber shops, hotel lobbies and the like. Ray Oldenberg in
The Great Good Place has categorized them as Third Places.
|